91. Argument
Inspired by @Melistress‘ tweet. (Tweets are protected, so follow this excellent micro-blogger for full benefits of link-clicking.)
Inspired by @Melistress‘ tweet. (Tweets are protected, so follow this excellent micro-blogger for full benefits of link-clicking.)
The arguments I heard against multiple/group marriage were all predicated on them being non-consensual. Yeah, not convincing.
Well, that’s easy – when applying for marriage when you’ve already got a partner, get authorisation from partners with witnesses, or something.
We are in danger of creating a society where all relationships between consenting adults are tolerated and upheld. That would be terrible, as I am sure you would agree.
Obviously, that was sarcasm. I wonder how homophobic, transphobic and (is there a word the covers all the phobias?) one could be before it becomes impossible to enjoy this comic.
Oh obviously that would be horrible. >.>
Those tweets are protected… so noone who doesn’t follow her can see them.
Just thought you should know 😉
Oh yes, there is that. Hmmmm. I don’t want to remove the link, so I’ll just add a little note. Thank you. 🙂